These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Should we include anti-prothrombin antibodies in the screening for the antiphospholipid syndrome? Author: Galli M. Journal: J Autoimmun; 2000 Sep; 15(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 10968893. Abstract: Anti-prothrombin antibodies belong to the family of the antiphospholipid antibodies. Their prevalence ranges from 50 to 90% of antiphospholipid-positive patients, depending on the laboratory methodology employed for their detection. ELISA techniques are the most commonly used methods for their measurements, which allow a quick determination of their titer and isotype(s). Unfortunately, no well standardized assays are yet commercially available. The clinical relevance of anti-prothrombin antibodies as risk factors for thromboembolic events has been investigated by a number of retrospective and case-control studies. We reviewed 11 studies: data on 1,440 patients and 371 sex- and age-matched controls were available. Seven studies reported a significant association between anti-prothrombin antibodies and thrombosis by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed in five studies: only two of them confirmed the association. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-prothrombin antibodies for thrombosis were analysed according to the antibody isotype and to the arterial and/or venous site of thrombosis. The sensitivities are disappointingly low, particularly when the M isotype and arterial thrombosis are considered, whereas the specificities are somewhat better, even though they range widely. These data do not allow to recommend the measurement of anti-prothrombin antibodies in the routine laboratory workout of antiphospholipid-positive patients in order to define their thrombotic risk.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]