These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar multisegmental fixation: an analysis of construct stiffness and screw-rod strain.
    Author: Oda I, Cunningham BW, Lee GA, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee PC.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Sep 15; 25(18):2303-11. PubMed ID: 10984781.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: Three types of anterior thoracolumbar multisegmental fixation were biomechanically compared in construct stiffness and rod-screw strain. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of rod diameter and rod number on construct stiffness and rod-screw strain in anterior thoracolumbar multisegmental instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No studies have been undertaken to investigate the biomechanical effects of rod diameter and rod number in thoracolumbar anterior instrumentation. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen calf spines (T13-L5) were used. After intact analysis, a total discectomy and transection of the ALL and PLL were performed at L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4 with intervertebral reconstruction using carbon fiber cages. Three types of anterior fixation were then performed at L1-L4: 1) 4.75-mm diameter single-rod, 2) 4.75-mm dual-rod, and 3) 6.35-mm single-rod systems. Single screws at each vertebra were used for single-rod and two screws for dual-rod fixation. These systems share the same basic design except rod diameter. Nondestructive biomechanical testing was performed and included compression, torsion, flexion-extension, and lateral bending. Construct stiffness and rod-screw strain of the three reconstructions were compared. RESULTS: The 6.35-mm single-rod fixation significantly improved construct stiffness compared with the 4.75-mm single rod fixation only under torsion (P < 0.05). The 4. 75-mm dual rod construct resulted in significantly higher stiffness than did both single-rod fixations (P < 0.05), except under compression. No statistical differences were observed in rod-screw strain between the two types of single rods, whereas dual-rod reconstruction exhibited less rod-screw strain (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For single-rod fixation, increased rod diameter neither markedly improved construct stiffness nor affected rod-screw strain, indicating the limitations of a single-rod system. In thoracolumbar anterior multisegmental instrumentation, the dual-rod fixation provides higher construct stiffness and less rod-screw strain compared with single-rod fixation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]