These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessment of shoulder strength in professional baseball pitchers.
    Author: Donatelli R, Ellenbecker TS, Ekedahl SR, Wilkes JS, Kocher K, Adam J.
    Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 30(9):544-51. PubMed ID: 10994864.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: A bilateral comparison of strength and range of motion testing in professional baseball pitchers. OBJECTIVE: We studied 39 professional male baseball pitchers to determine if the shoulder used for throwing was weaker or had less passive range of motion, compared to the nondominant arm. BACKGROUND: Shoulder muscle weakness has been proposed as a possible risk factor for developing injury. Therefore, objective quantification of the strength of glenohumeral and scapular rotator muscle groups should be studied in a population of professional baseball pitchers. METHODS AND MEASURES: Passive internal and external range of motion was bilaterally measured at 90 degrees of abduction. Muscle strength of the following muscles was measured bilaterally with a hand-held dynamometer: external and internal glenohumeral rotators, supraspinatus, middle trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior. RESULTS: Passive external rotation of the glenohumeral joint at 90 degrees of abduction on the pitching side was significantly greater than on the nonpitching side. Passive internal rotation range of motion on the nonpitching side was significantly greater than on the pitching side. The pitching arm's internal rotators, when tested in abduction, were significantly stronger than the nonpitching arm. The nonpitching arm's external rotators in the plane of the scapula, and in abduction, were significantly greater than those of the pitching arm. The pitching arm's middle and lower trapezius muscles were significantly stronger than those of the nonpitching arm. CONCLUSION: The range of motion and strength characteristics measured in this study can assist clinicians in evaluating athletes who use overhead throwing motions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]