These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Germ cell transplantation from large domestic animals into mouse testes.
    Author: Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL.
    Journal: Mol Reprod Dev; 2000 Nov; 57(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 11013435.
    Abstract:
    Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important domestic animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]