These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study.
    Author: Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Pölz W, Tews G.
    Journal: Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):797-801. PubMed ID: 11020526.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonographic measurement of the endometrium in predicting pregnancy in an IVF-ET program. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Center for assisted reproductive techniques. PATIENT(S): 65 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Ultrasonographic examination on the day of hCG administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometrial volume, endometrial thickness, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): The mean (+/-SD) endometrium volume (4.16 +/- 1.97 mL), endometrium thickness (11 +/- 2 mm), and estradiol level (1686.82 +/- 1057.10 pg/mL) in 21 pregnant women on the day of hCG administration did not differ statistically differ from the respective values in 44 nonpregnant women (4.53 +/- 1.79 mL; 11 +/- 2 mm, 1883.56 +/- 1147.21 pg/mL). Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that the area under curve (AUC) was 0.57 for endometrial volume and 0.48 for endometrial thickness. Using a cut-off value of 2.5 mL for endometrial volume to predict pregnancy, results of the Fisher exact test were statistically significant. No significant cut-off value was found for endometrial thickness. CONCLUSION(S): Endometrial volume and thickness on the day of hCG administration did not predict occurrence of pregnancy. A minimum volume of 2.5 mL appeared to favor pregnancy. The predictive value of 3D ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial volume and thickness was better than that of 2D measurement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]