These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Genogeographic analysis of a subdivided population. II. Geography of random inbreeding (from frequency of surnames in Adygs)].
    Author: Balanovskaia EV, Pocheshkhova EA, Balanovskiĭ OP, Ginter EK.
    Journal: Genetika; 2000 Aug; 36(8):1126-39. PubMed ID: 11033785.
    Abstract:
    An important characteristic of the genetic structure of populations, random inbreeding (interpopulation variation), was evaluated on the basis of quasi-genetic markers (surnames). The following methodological issues are considered: estimation of random inbreeding using the coefficient of isonymy fr in a subdivided population; a comparison of inbreeding levels calculated on the basis of surname frequencies using fr and Wright's FST; a comparison of inbreeding estimates obtained on the basis of surnames and genetic markers; inbreeding variation in populations of the same hierarchical rank; and planning of genetic studies of a subdivided population. The population of Adygs (an indigenous ethnic group of Northern Caucasus) was examined as a model subdivided population. The population system of Adygs is hierarchical. Parameters of random inbreeding were examined at each level of the system "ethnic group==>tribe==>geographic group of auls==>aul." Frequencies of surnames were collected subtotally. Data on frequencies of 1340 surnames in 61 auls representing all Adyg tribes were analyzed. In total, 60,000 people were examined. The inbreeding estimates obtained on the basis of Wright's FST and the coefficient of isonymy fr virtually coincided: for Adygs in general, FST x 10(2) = 2.13 and fr x 10(2) = 2.09. At the same time, the inbreeding level exhibited marked differences among tribes: in Shapsugs, these differences were an order of magnitude higher than in Kabardins (fr x 10(2) = 2.53 and 0.25, respectively). The inbreeding estimates for auls differed by two orders of magnitudes: fr x 10(2) = 0.07 and fr x 10(2) = 7.88. An analysis of ten auls yielded fully coinciding inbreeding estimates based on quasi-genetic (fr x 10(2) = 0.60) and classical (FST x 10(2) = 0.69) gene markers. Computer maps of surname distributions in Adygs (1340 maps) were constructed for the first time ever. Based on these maps, the map of random inbreeding in the Adyg population was obtained.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]