These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Constant vs. automatic continuous positive airway pressure therapy: home evaluation.
    Author: d'Ortho MP, Grillier-Lanoir V, Levy P, Goldenberg F, Corriger E, Harf A, Lofaso F.
    Journal: Chest; 2000 Oct; 118(4):1010-7. PubMed ID: 11035671.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and patient tolerance, compliance, and preference between auto-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and constant CPAP. DESIGN: Single-blinded, crossover, cohort study of consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, with two treatment periods of 2 months each. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients (22 men, 3 women) with sleep apnea syndrome confirmed by ambulatory polysomnography. MEASUREMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: After baseline polysomnography, patients underwent in-laboratory polysomnography for titration of constant CPAP. The order of treatment was randomly allocated, either auto-CPAP and then constant CPAP, or vice versa. The auto-CPAP pressure range was 6 to 16 cm H(2)O. At the end of each 2-month period, patients underwent a control ambulatory polysomnography and received a questionnaire on subjective well-being and device evaluation. Duration of use was checked through CPAP device monitoring. RESULTS: No differences were found in apnea/hypopnea index (constant CPAP, 9.7+/-1.9 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 10.6+/-9.3 events/h), awakening/arousal index (constant CPAP, 13.7 +/- 8.0 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 15.5 +/- 8.9 events/h), slow-wave sleep duration, nocturnal saturation, or complaint of daytime sleepiness. The mean pressure required was significantly lower during auto-CPAP than during constant CPAP (8.8+/-1.8 cm H(2)O vs. 9.7+/-2.6 cm H(2)O, respectively). Patient tolerance, compliance, and duration of use were similar with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Auto-CPAP is as effective as constant CPAP. A wide pressure range for auto-CPAP can be used in all patients, suggesting that, in the future, use of a broad pressure range in the auto-CPAP mode could obviate the need for the titration night.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]