These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Which ocular and neurologic conditions cause disparate results in visual acuity scores recorded with visually evoked potential and teller acuity cards?
    Author: Westall CA, Ainsworth JR, Buncic JR.
    Journal: J AAPOS; 2000 Oct; 4(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 11040480.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: We investigated whether disparity between visually evoked potential (VEP) acuity scores and Teller Acuity Card (TAC) scores varied according to presence of ocular or neurologic conditions. METHODS: Charts from 175 children (mean age, 34.8 months; range, 3 to 158 months) referred for visual acuity testing were examined. All children had been tested with pattern-alternation VEP and TAC and had undergone a complete eye examination. VEP and TAC acuity scores were relative to age-expected acuity scores for each acuity test. The absence and degree of macular abnormality, retinal abnormality, optic nerve hypoplasia, optic nerve atrophy, cortical visual impairment, developmental delay, cerebral palsy, seizures, and nystagmus were noted. Analysis of variance models were used to determine whether differences between VEP and TAC scores varied according to the presence of specific deficits. Logistic regression analysis determined whether degree of specific deficits was associated with a greater chance of inconsistency between VEP and TAC scores (>0.3 log unit difference). RESULTS: Inconsistent scores were found in 48% of children. Developmental delay was associated with relatively poorer TAC than VEP score, and the chance of inconsistency increased with severity of developmental delay. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis-dependent variability exists between TAC and VEP scores. Therefore knowledge of the clinical picture is necessary in interpretation of VEP and TAC scores. It is not clear which test is more useful when a disparity exists, either from this or previous studies. When visual acuity is assessed longitudinally in a given child, then consistency in method for acuity assessment is important.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]