These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Prevalence of microbial colonization in removed peritoneal catheters: a prospective study. Author: Rodríguez-Carmona A, Pérez Fontán M, García Falcón T, Valdés Cañedo F. Journal: Adv Perit Dial; 2000; 16():276-9. PubMed ID: 11045310. Abstract: We conducted a prospective bacteriologic study of 89 peritoneal catheters removed from 77 peritoneal dialysis patients. Reasons for catheter removal included severe peritonitis (n = 36, Group A), persistent exit-site infection (n = 29, Group B), and dormant, seemingly uninfected catheters (n = 22, Group C). We studied the external cuff (EC) and internal cuff (IC) as well as the catheter tip. In Group A, microbial growth was seen in 86.1% of ECs, 66.7% of ICs, and 67.6% of tips. In cases of positive isolation, concordance was 91.7% IC versus EC, 84.2% IC versus tip, and 80.0% EC versus tip. The peritonitis agent was recovered from 61.1% of ECs, 50.0% of ICs, and 55.6% of tips. In Group B, colonization was seen in 72.4% of ECs, 44.8% of ICs, and 31.0% of tips. When an isolation was obtained from both EC and IC, concordance was 81.8%. The exit-site infection agent was recovered from 69% of ECs and 24% of ICs. In Group C, microbial growth was observed in 77.3% of ECs, 45.5% of ICs, and 31.8% of tips. Gram-positive bacteria predominated, with the same bacteria colonizing EC and IC in 66.7% of cases. In conclusion, removed peritoneal catheters present a high prevalence of extensive microbial colonization, even in the absence of overt infection.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]