These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Vitamin A status assessment in rats with (13)C(4)-retinyl acetate and gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry.
    Author: Tanumihardjo SA.
    Journal: J Nutr; 2000 Nov; 130(11):2844-9. PubMed ID: 11053530.
    Abstract:
    Vitamin A assessment methods that indirectly determine liver reserves are still in development. The deuterated vitamin A assay has been successfully applied in several population groups, but large doses of vitamin A must be used and the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis is not very sensitive. Therefore, 10,11,14,15-(13)C(4)-retinyl acetate was synthesized using a modified Wittig-Horner procedure. Thereafter, female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 47) were fed a vitamin A-deficient diet and divided into three groups: low (L), moderate (M) and high (H) vitamin A. Groups L, M and H were supplemented with 35, 70 and 350 nmol of unlabeled retinyl acetate/d for 17 d. On d 18, three rats from each group were killed to determine baseline (13)C levels. Serum was prepared, and livers were collected and stored at -70 degrees C until analyzed with HPLC and gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The remaining rats were supplemented with 52 nmol of (13)C(4)-retinyl acetate. Rats were killed on d 1, 2, 4 and 10. The calculated and measured values of total body reserves (TBR) of vitamin A were within 7% of each other overall, and the relationship was linear (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001). The calculated mean TBR were 0.49 +/- 0.03, 0.82 +/- 0.007 and 3.72 +/- 0.40 micromol, and the measured mean TBR were 0.50 +/- 0.045, 0.69 +/- 0.10 and 3.6 +/- 0.29 micromol for groups L, M and H, respectively. In contrast, serum retinol concentrations did not show a difference among the dietary groups: 1.32 +/- 0.14, 1.35 +/- 0.17 and 1.28 +/- 0.15 micromol/L for groups L, M and H, respectively (P = 0.25). In conclusion, this method offers more sensitivity than traditional methods and may be applicable to human vitamin A status assessment when TBR estimations are desired.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]