These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of concentrated n-3 fatty acids versus gemfibrozil on plasma lipoproteins, low density lipoprotein heterogeneity and oxidizability in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
    Author: Stalenhoef AF, de Graaf J, Wittekoek ME, Bredie SJ, Demacker PN, Kastelein JJ.
    Journal: Atherosclerosis; 2000 Nov; 153(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 11058707.
    Abstract:
    We evaluated in a double-blind randomized trial with a double-dummy design in 28 patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia, the effect of gemfibrozil (1200 mg/day) versus Omacor (4 g/day), a drug containing the n-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on lipid and lipoprotein levels, low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction profile and LDL oxidizability. Both Omacor and gemfibrozil therapy resulted in a similar significant decrease in serum triglyceride (TG), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglyceride and VLDL cholesterol concentrations and an increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) and LDL cholesterol concentrations. The increase in LDL cholesterol was due to a significant increase in cholesterol content of the relatively buoyant LDL subfractions LDL1, LDL2 and LDL3, whereas the relative contribution of the dense LDL subfractions LDL4 and LDL5 to total LDL tended to decrease. So, both therapies resulted in a more buoyant LDL subfraction profile, reflected by a significant increase of the value of parameter K (+10.3% on Omacor vs. +26.5% on gemfibrozil therapy, gemfibrozil vs Omacor P>0.05). Cu(2+)-induced oxidation of LDL was measured by continuous monitoring of conjugated dienes. After 12 weeks of Omacor treatment LDL appeared more prone to oxidative modification in vitro than LDL after gemfibrozil treatment, as measured by the significantly decreased lag time, preceding the onset of the lipid peroxidation. In both groups the rate of oxidation did not change with therapy. The amount of dienes formed during oxidation increased significantly on Omacor treatment, but not on gemfibrozil treatment. Plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were higher after Omacor and lower after gemfibrozil treatment, although not significantly. We conclude that both Omacor and gemfibrozil have favorable effects on lipid and lipoprotein concentrations and the LDL subfraction profile. However, Omacor increased the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation, whereas gemfibrozil did not affect the resistance of LDL to oxidative modification in vitro. The clinical relevance of these changes remains to be established in the light of other postulated favorable effects of n-3 fatty acids on the course of cardiovascular disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]