These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Low-dose antithymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: results of a protocol of intermittent administration].
    Author: Mourad G, Portales P, Garrigue V, Djamali A, Bouloux C, Chong G, Clot J.
    Journal: Nephrologie; 2000; 21(5):253-8. PubMed ID: 11068775.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Despite the long history of use of antithymocyte globulins (ATG) in renal transplantation, ideal doses and duration of ATG administration based on the monitoring of T lymphocytes have yet to be defined. METHODS: Two immunosuppressive regimens based on low dose rabbit ATG (thymoglobuline, Imtix-Sangstat, Lyon-France) were assessed during the first year post-transplant: daily ATG (n = 32) where 50 mg of ATG were given every day and intermittent ATG (n = 24) where similar doses of ATG were given for the first three days and then intermittently only if CD3+T lymphocytes (measured by flow cytometry) were > 10/mm3. Both groups received steroids, azathioprine and cyclosporin A (CsA). RESULTS: ATG-induced depletion was similar for PBL and T cells in both groups: it began at day one post-transplant, was submaximal at day 3 and reached maximum intensity between days 6 and 8 from which time cell counts progressively increased. However, T cell depletion was still present at day 20. The total ATG dose per patient (361 +/- 105 vs 556 +/- 119 mg/patient) and the mean cumulative daily dose of ATG (0.60 +/- 0.17 vs 0.80 +/- 0.14 mg/kg/d) were significantly lower in the IATG group (p = 0.0001, and 0.0006 respectively). The overlap of ATG and CsA treatment was 6.7 +/- 3 vs 7.4 +/- 4.3 days (p = ns) and the mean duration of ATG therapy was 12 +/- 3 vs 11 +/- 2.5 days in the IATG and DATG groups respectively (p = ns). ATG were given in an average of one dose every 1.6 days in the IATG group compared to one dose daily in the DATG group (p = 7 x 10(-7). There was no significant difference in renal graft function, the number of acute graft rejections or ATG related side effects and complications. Despite daily immunological follow-up, there was a net saving of 920 $/patient in the cost of treatment in the intermittent ATG group. CONCLUSION: Intermittent ATG had the advantage of a reduction in the dose of ATG and in the cost of treatment while offering similar T cell depletion and effective immunosuppression. This approach could be proposed as an induction protocol, particularly for patients with poor graft function in whom CsA introduction has to be delayed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]