These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for failed imperforate anus surgery: lessons learned from secondary repairs.
    Author: Tsugawa C, Hisano K, Nishijima E, Muraji T, Satoh S.
    Journal: J Pediatr Surg; 2000 Nov; 35(11):1626-9. PubMed ID: 11083438.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary operations using a posterior sagittal approach in patients with fecal incontinence and impaction after primary repair of anorectal malformations. METHODS: Twenty patients (14 boys, 6 girls) who had previous failed surgery for imperforate anus underwent secondary operations. The indications for surgery included fecal incontinence (n = 16) and fecal impaction (n = 4). Patients ranged in age from 2 to 30 years (mean, 11 years), with 4 over the age of 20 years. The primary procedures included abdominosacroperineal (n = 7), sacroperineal (n = 10), and perineal (n = 3) pull-throughs. At surgery, none of the patients underwent a diverting colostomy. The rectum was mobilized from the surrounding structures through a posterior sagittal approach. The surgical findings included anteriorly displaced anus (n = 17), laterally displaced anus (n = 3), mesenteric fat surrounding the rectum (n = 4), mega-rectosigmoid (n = 2), and others (n = 3). The rectum underwent reconstruction, which involved relocation of the rectum and anus to surround them with the muscle complex. RESULTS: Patients underwent follow-up for periods ranging from 8 months to 6 years after surgery (mean, 3 years). To evaluate the functional results, fecal continence scores (Templeton and Ditesheim) were calculated for incontinent patients. Of the 16 incontinent patients, 12 achieved continence and 4 some improvement. Of the 4 patients with fecal impaction, 2 achieved daily voluntary bowel movement, whereas the other 2 have mild constipation and need occasional enemas. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that (1) a secondary operation through a posterior sagittal approach can restore fecal continence and is efficacious even in adolescents and adults and (2) a posterior sagittal procedure can be safely performed without a diverting colostomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]