These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Author: Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Townsend G.
    Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 11094363.
    Abstract:
    Forty children displaying Class II Division 1 malocclusion were involved in a prospective magnetic resonance image investigation to evaluate the effects of Twin-block functional appliances on the temporomandibular joints. None of these children had clinical signs or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Nineteen children were treated with a Clark Twin-block appliance for 6 months; the other 21 children received no treatment and served as controls. Comparison between control and Clark Twin-block groups suggested that reduction of the condylar axial angle represents a feature of untreated Class II growth patterns, whereas axial angle stability with Clark Twin-block therapy may suggest alteration of condylar growth direction. Condyles that were positioned at the crest of the articular eminence by the Clark Twin-block at the beginning of treatment had reseated back into the glenoid fossa after 6 months. However, 75% of the condyles were more anteriorly positioned in successfully treated Clark Twin-block cases. There was no clear evidence of remodeling of the glenoid fossa at the eminence as a result of Clark Twin-block treatment. The initial prevalence of disk displacements for the combined groups was 7.5% anterior, 5% medial, and 12.5% for lateral disk displacement. Clark Twin-block therapy had neither positive nor negative effects on disk position, and there was no convincing evidence that the disk was recaptured.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]