These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparative assessment of helical CT-angiography, 2D TOF MR-angiography and 3D gadolinium enhanced MRA in aorto-iliac occlusive disease].
    Author: Bourlet P, De Fraissinnette B, Garcier JM, Lipiecka E, Privat C, Ravel A, Franconi JM, Boyer L.
    Journal: J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 81(11):1619-25. PubMed ID: 11104977.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare helical CT-angiography (CTA) and two techniques of MR angiography (MRA) to conventional angiography in aorto-iliac occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 22 patients (4 for preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and 18 for peripheral vascular disease) were imaged using four techniques: digital subtraction angiography ("gold standard"), 2D TOF MR angiography, 3D Gd-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography. Source (CTA and 2D TOF MRA) and MIPed images (after subtraction measures before and after gadolinium injection for 3D Gd-MRA) were reviewed. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of significant (>50%) stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries were respectively: 38%, 89%, 77% for 2D TOF MRA; 75%, 71%, 72% for 3D Gd-MRA and 95%, 90%, 92% for CTA. Excluding the internal iliac arteries, results were 54%, 96%, 88% for 2D TOF MRA; 96%, 80%, 83% for 3D Gd-MRA and 92%, 93%, 95% for CTA. CONCLUSION: 3D Gd-MRA, a technique with potential for further improvement, is superior to 2D TOF MRA for detecting significant stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries. Results at Gd-MRA are nearly similar to those at CTA (after excluding internal iliac arteries). Results at Gd-MRA are not affected by calcified plaque.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]