These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of citrate concentration on coagulation test results in dogs.
    Author: Stokol T, Brooks MB, Erb HN.
    Journal: J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Dec 01; 217(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 11110458.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of citrate concentration (3.2 vs 3.8%) on coagulation tests in dogs. DESIGN: Original study. ANIMALS: 30 clinically healthy dogs and 12 dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders. PROCEDURE: Blood was collected from all dogs directly into collection tubes containing 3.2 or 3.8% buffered citrate. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen concentration were measured by use of 3 clot-detection assay systems (2 mechanical and 1 photo-optic). Factor VIII and factor IX coagulant activities (FVIII:C and FIX:C, respectively) were determined by use of a manual tilt-tube method and a mechanical clot-detection device. RESULTS: Significant differences were not detected in median PT, fibrinogen concentration, FVIII:C, or FIX:C between 3.2 and 3.8% citrate for any assay system. A significant prolongation in aPTT for 3.2% citrate, compared with 3.8% citrate, was found in 1 mechanical system. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Citrate concentration does not significantly affect results of most coagulation assays, regardless of assay system. The aPTT was mildly influenced by the citrate concentration, although this was animal-, instrument-, and reagent-dependent. The choice of 3.2 or 3.8% citrate as an anticoagulant for coagulation tests has minimal influence on assay results in healthy dogs or dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]