These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Remote extracochlear versus intracochlear recordings in the guinea pig.
    Author: Durrant JD, Ronis ML.
    Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(1 Pt 1):88-93. PubMed ID: 1111437.
    Abstract:
    A comparison was made of the whole-nerve action potential recorded from a wire electrode placed on the tympanic membrane (TM) (remote extracochlear recording) and than recorded from intracochlear electrodes in the first and third turn scala tympani of the guinea pig. Cochlear microphonics and summating potentials were also studied. The expected decreased sensitivity at the TM site was observed in all responses, although the microphonic (CM) was diminished more that the action potential (AP) as compared to the responses monitored via the ST1 electrode. Nevertheless, the TM-recorded cochlear potentials largely mimicked the ST1-recorded potentials in a qualitative manner, i.e., similar configurations of the CM pseudo-threshold functions. It was consistently observed that the N2 of the AP is proportionally larger (relative to N1) in the TM recording than in the ST1 recording. These phenomena were attributed to the complex spread of the bioelectrical potentials in the nonhomogeneous volume conductor formed by the tissues of the temporal bone. It was suggested that the observed change in the N1/N2 ratio at the different sites of recording is due to the different contributions of second-order neuronal discharges to the compound AP. In effect, the TM electrode "sees" proportionally more activity from second-order fibers than does the ST1 electrode, and the ST3 electrode, less.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]