MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: The determination of cardiac surgical risk using artificial neural networks.
Author: Buzatu DA, Taylor KK, Peret DC, Darsey JA, Lang NP.
Journal: J Surg Res; 2001 Jan; 95(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 11120637.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In the study presented here, an artificial neural network was used to "learn" the relationship between 11 risk factors and patient surgical outcome (survival or death). The network was then used to predict the surgical outcome of other patients. METHODS: Eleven risk factors were presented as inputs to an artificial neural network (ANN). The ANN model was developed by training and testing on 1875 patients. The results of the ANN were compared with the results from two versions of the VA surgical risk model (Denver model). Cutoffs were determined for each model in order to compare their results. RESULTS: The ANN model gave the best results when compared with the new and old Denver models. The ANN model had the lowest overall percentage of error. It predicted living patients with an error of 14% and death with an error of approximately 31.0%. The old Denver model predicted living patients with an error of 15% and deaths with an error of 31%. The new Denver model predicts living patients with an error around 18% and the deaths with an error of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The combined predictions of the ANN model were slightly more accurate than either the new or the old Denver models. The ANN model was created from 1875 patients in about 1 month, while both of the Denver models were developed over a 3 year time period and used more than 12,000 patients. Additionally, the ANN model is easily modified, allowing instant addition or deletion of parameters to suit the users needs.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]