These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Argatroban and alteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the ARGAMI Study.
    Author: Vermeer F, Vahanian A, Fels PW, Besse P, Müller E, Van de Werf F, Fitzgerald D, Darius H, Puel J, Garrigou D, Simoons ML, ARGAMI Study Group.
    Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2000 Dec; 10(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11122543.
    Abstract:
    ARGAMI was designed to assess safety and efficacy of argatroban compared with heparin as adjunctive treatment to alteplase in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. ARGAMI consisted of an open-dose finding study (35 patients) followed by a placebo-controlled study with double dummy technique and 2:1 (argatroban:heparin) randomization. An argatroban dosage of 100 microg/kg bolus plus 3 microg/kg/min infusion for 72 hours was selected for the randomized study in which 82 patients were allocated to argatroban and 45 to heparin (5000 U intravenous bolus, 1000 U/h infusion). Patency of the infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3 flow) after 90 minutes was obtained in 62 patients (76%) allocated to argatroban versus 37 patients (82%) allocated to heparin (p=ns). Angiograms after 24 hours and 5 to 10 days showed low reocclusion rates in both groups. Bleeding complications were observed in 16 patients allocated to argatroban (19.5%) and in 9 patients allocated to heparin (20.0%). One patient allocated to heparin suffered from hemorrhage stroke. Argatroban, given as adjunctive treatment to alteplase, is tolerated well in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Safety and efficacy of the combination alteplase and argatroban (with this dose regimen) are similar to those of alteplase and heparin.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]