These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: DNA structure: what's in charge? Author: McConnell KJ, Beveridge DL. Journal: J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec 15; 304(5):803-20. PubMed ID: 11124028. Abstract: DNA structure is well known to be sensitive to hydration and ionic strength. Recent theoretical predictions and experimental observations have raised the idea of the intrusion of monovalent cations into the minor groove spine of hydration in B-form DNA. To investigate this further, extensions and further analysis of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on d(CGCCGAATTCGCG), d(ATAGGCAAAAAATAGGCAAAAATGG) and d(G(5)-(GA(4)T(4)C)(2)-C(5)), including counterions and water, have been performed. To examine the effective of minor groove ions on structure, we analyzed the MD snapshots from a 15 ns trajectory on d(CGCGAATTCGCG) as two subsets: those exhibiting a minor groove water spine and those with groove-bound ions. The results indicate that Na(+) at the ApT step of the minor groove of d(CGCCGAATTCGCG) makes only small local changes in the DNA structure, and these changes are well within the thermal fluctuations calculated from the MD. To examine the effect of ions on the differential stability of a B-form helix, further analysis was performed on two longer oligonucleotides, which exhibit A-tract-induced axis bending localized around the CpG step in the major groove. Plots of axis bending and proximity of ions to the bending locus were generated as a function of time and revealed a strong linear correlation, supporting the idea that mobile cations play a key role in local helix deformations of DNA and indicating ion proximity just precedes the bending event. To address the issue of "what's in charge?" of DNA structure more generally, the relative free energy of A and B-form d(CGCGAATTCGCG) structures from MD simulations under various environmental circumstances were estimated using the free energy component method. The results indicate that the dominant effects on conformational stability come from the electrostatic free energy, but not exclusively from groove bound ions per se, but from a balance of competing factors in the electrostatic free energy, including phosphate repulsions internal to the DNA, the electrostatic component of hydration (i.e. solvent polarization), and electrostatic effects of the counterion atmosphere. In summary, free energy calculations indicate that the electrostatic component is dominant, MD shows temporal proximity of mobile counterions to be correlated with A-track-induced bending, and thus the mobile ion component of electrostatics is a significant contributor. However, the MD structure of the dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG) is not highly sensitive to whether there is a sodium ion in the minor groove.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]