These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Left Atrial Systolic Performance in the Presence of Elevated Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure: Evaluation by Transesophageal Pulsed Doppler Echocardiography of Left Ventricular Inflow and Pulmonary Venous Flow Velocities.
    Author: Oki T, Fukuda N, Iuchi A, Tabata T, Tanimoto M, Manabe K, Kageji Y, Sasaki M, Yamada H, Ito S.
    Journal: Echocardiography; 1997 Jan; 14(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 11174919.
    Abstract:
    We recorded left ventricular inflow (LVIF) and pulmonary venous flow (PVF) velocities by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 25 patients with a ratio of peak atrial systolic to early diastolic LVIF velocity of <1 and a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 15 mmHg or greater, as well as in 30 normal subjects. The group consisted of 14 patients with prior myocardial infarction, 7 with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 4 with cardiac amyloidosis, and were divided into: (1) group A (n = 7): peak atrial systolic LVIF velocity of 40 cm/sec or greater; (2) group B (n = 7): peak atrial systolic LVIF velocity of <40 cm/sec and peak atrial systolic PVF velocity of 30 cm/sec or greater; and (3) group C (n = 11): peak atrial systolic LVIF velocity of <40 cm/sec and peak atrial systolic PVF velocity of <30 cm/sec. Although LVEDPs in groups B and C were significantly greater than in group A, there was no difference between groups B and C. The mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mPCWP) in group C was significantly greater than in groups A and B, but there was no difference between groups A and B. The difference between LVEDP and mPCWP (LVEDP - mPCWP) in group B was significantly higher than in groups A and C. Dilatation of the left atrium (LA) was seen in all three groups, particularly in groups B and C. There were no differences in peak atrial systolic LVIF velocity and LA volume change during atrial contraction between group A and the control group, and there were no differences in LA volume change and peak second systolic PVF velocity between groups A and B. LA volume change and peak second systolic PVF velocity were significantly less in group C than in groups A and B. Among the four patients whose courses could be observed after medical treatment with diuretic and vasodilator, one changed from group B to A, one from group B to C, one from group C to A, and one remained in group C. Thus, recording of peak atrial systolic LVIF and PVF by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography permits detailed evaluation of LA systolic performance in the presence of elevated LVEDP. These two variables provide important information for less invasive differentiation of LA afterload mismatch from LA myocardial failure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]