These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Mesh repair of inguinal and femoral hernia]. Author: Leardi S, Delmonaco S, Pietroletti R, Perri S, Citone G, Simi M. Journal: Chir Ital; 2000; 52(5):579-83. PubMed ID: 11190553. Abstract: The authors describe a 6-year experience with mesh repair of inguinal and femoral hernia in a surgical teaching department. Two hundred and ninety-seven hernioplasties were performed in 256 consecutive patients: 237 Trabucco sutureless and 11 Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasties for inguinal hernia; 21 tension-free hernioplasties for femoral hernia; 20 Wantz GPRVS and 8 Rutkow tension-free hernioplaties for recurrences. Local anaesthesia was used in 59% of cases. Seventy-two patients (28.1%) refused this type of anaesthesia. The hospital stay was two days in all cases. The local postoperative morbidity rate was 8.7% (wound infections: 1.0%; neuralgia: 1.3%; haematomas: 2.0%; seromas: 2.3%; no testicular atrophies). The recurrence rate was 1.9% in the group of patients undergoing surgery from 1994 to 1997 (103 herniorrhaphies; follow-up: 3-6 years) and 0% in the group of patients operated on after 1997 (170 herniorrhaphies; follow-up: 2 years-6 months). The results confirm that the use of a prosthetic mesh (patch and plug) is the treatment of choice for hernia repair. Moreover, this experience in a surgical teaching department shows that these procedures can be safely and effectively performed by all surgeons.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]