These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cost-efficacy comparison of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in the treatment of asthma.
    Author: Stempel DA, Stanford RH, Thwaites R, Price MJ.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1562-74. PubMed ID: 11192147.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The results of a recent meta-analysis comparing 2 inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide, demonstrated that FP had an improved efficacy-to-safety ratio compared with budesonide. However, limited data are available on the relative economic benefits of these 2 regimens. OBJECTIVE: This pharmacoeconomic analysis used individual patient data from studies in the meta-analysis to compare the relative cost-efficacy of 2 asthma regimens from the perspective of a US third-party payer. METHODS: This analysis included all 7 studies in the meta-analysis that compared budesonide with FP dosed at approximately half the dose of budesonide and that included measurement of daily morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). RESULTS: The total daily per-person cost of asthma management was higher for patients treated with budesonide than with FP ($3.00 vs $2.25, respectively). Treatment with FP had greater cost-efficacy than treatment with budesonide, based on a range of outcome measures that included improvement in morning PEF, symptom-free days, and episode-free days. The daily cost per effectively treated patient (an increase in PEF of > or = 10%) was $5.62 with FP and $10.05 with budesonide. The cost per symptom-free day was $4.36 with FP, compared with $6.67 with budesonide. The cost per episode-free day was $5.60 with FP and $9.42 with budesonide. The pharmacoeconomic difference continued to favor FP as the criteria for success were made more stringent and the cost of budesonide was lowered. CONCLUSION: Based on data from the 7 randomized, controlled trials, treatment of asthma with FP was more effective and less expensive, using US health care assumptions and costs, than treatment with budesonide.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]