These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Automated swinging flashlight test in patients with optic nerve diseases].
    Author: Wilhelm B, Lüdtke H, Peters T, Schmid R, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E.
    Journal: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11225395.
    Abstract:
    AIM OF THE STUDY: The swinging flashlight test is an objective method to diagnose a lesion of the anterior visual pathways. However, errors and faults may easily alter the test's results. Hence, the value of the swinging flashlight test depends highly on the examiner's skills. Therefore an automated and objective procedure was developed which is independent from the examiner. METHODS: A binocularly measuring instrument adapted for video pupillography was supplied with two arrays of light emitting diodes in front of each eye of the subject. By means of this illumination, pupillary light reflexes are elicited alternately. Pupil size is registered continuously, and after artifact elimination, the response amplitudes of the pupils are determined as a mean of right and left pupil. Responses elicited via right and left eye are compared. By varying the stimulus intensity it is possible to measure the amount of the relative afferent pupillary defect. The procedure was tested in 31 patients with optic nerve disorders. RESULTS: The measurements were easily feasible, stable and reliable. Correlation between the relative afferent pupillary defect detected manually by grey filter compensating and with the automated procedure proved to be high. Both variables correlated highly significant with a Spearman rank coefficient of 0.65. If the clinical test is regarded as the golden standard, the automated swinging flashlight test is able to detect 85% of the relative afferent pupillary defects > or = 0.3 logE and 94% of the defects > or = 0.6 logE. CONCLUSION: The automated swinging flashlight test can be recommended to exclude influences by the examiner or if the exact amount of the relative afferent pupillary defect is desired, e.g. when monitoring therapeutic effects in optic nerve diseases. Furthermore, an automated swinging flashlight test could serve as a screening test.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]