These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Incidence of fractures after the age of 50 years in the Lebanese population and implications in terms of osteoporosis]. Author: Baddoura R, Okais J, Awada H. Journal: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11226916. Abstract: BACKGROUND: No comprehensive population-based data is available on the incidence of fractures in Lebanon and the Middle-East. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the Lebanese population aged 50 years and over. METHODS: In 1997, a cross-sectional population-based random sample of individuals aged 50 years and over was selected using a multiple level cluster sampling technique. Selected individuals responded to an Arabic version of the EULAR questionnaire. A fracture was defined as incident if it had occurred within the last year. The lifetime risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using the incidence rate by ten-year age groups assuming that each individual counts on the average for half the interval. RESULTS: 1003 individuals were included. There were 496 men (49.5%) and 507 women (50.5%). Mean age was 61.3 years (CI: 60.8-61.8) with a maximum of 88 years. The observed number of fractures was 111, giving an absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures of 11.1% (CI: 9.1-12.9). It was higher in women, 13.0% (CI: 10.9-15.1) than in men, 8.6% (CI: 6.9-9.3). Female to male ratio was 1.6. The estimated annual incidence was 2.6% (CI: 2.0-3.2), higher in women, 3.8% (CI: 2.2-5.5) than in men, 1.4% (CI: 0.4-2.5). Incident cases were distributed as follows: 4-hip, 4-forearm, 3-spine, and 15 other sites. Annual incidence was higher in women than in men for all sites. Estimated lifetime risk of osteoporotic fracture was 9.3% (CI: 6.7-11.9) in men and 16.7% (CI: 13.4-19.9) in women. CONCLUSION: Our figures are lower than those found in Northern Europe but are higher than in Asian countries, possibly reflecting a west-east gradient in risk factors.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]