These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Iohexol as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in patients with diabetes: comparison of multiple and simplified sampling protocols.
    Author: Pucci L, Bandinelli S, Pilo M, Nannipieri M, Navalesi R, Penno G.
    Journal: Diabet Med; 2001 Feb; 18(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 11251674.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: To report on the reproducibility of iohexol glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation, to compare the plasma clearance of iohexol with that of[51Cr]EDTA and to evaluate the reliability of reduced sampling schedules in estimating GFR in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Agreement was assessed in 15 Type 1 and 26 Type 2 diabetics with creatinine ranging from 53 to 564 micromol/l. RESULTS: The regression between multiple-sample iohexol and[51Cr]EDTA clearances was 0.999 in Type 1 and 0.987 in Type 2 diabetes (P < 0.0001 for both). A seven-sample design and the three-sample approach by Brøchner-Mortensen were validated by comparison with the full-sample schedule in 87 patients (51 Type 1, 36 Type 2). Full-sample GFR was 80.3 +/- 43.8, seven-sample 79.5 +/- 43.9 (r = 0.990) and three-sample 79.8 +/- 45.2 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2 (r = 0.972). The coefficients of variation of GFR were 2.7 +/- 1.4% and 3.8 +/- 1.9% for the full-sample and the seven-sample approaches, respectively, and significantly higher for the three-sample design (6.9 +/- 3.4%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After iohexol injection, the Brøchner-Mortensen schedule does not provide an accurate estimate of GFR. The seven-sample approach gives acceptable errors and allows a good estimate of GFR throughout a wide range of renal function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]