These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effects of chilling on sampling of bacteria attached to swine carcasses. Author: Yu SL, Cooke PH, Tu SI. Journal: Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 32(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 11264754. Abstract: Two microbiological sampling techniques, excision and sponge swabbing, were compared by determining counts of aerobic bacteria, coliforms and injured coliforms from 20 de-haired swine carcasses before and after chilling. Excised jowl skin produced significantly greater counts of the three types of bacteria than sponge swabs. Aerobic bacteria, coliforms and injured coliforms recovered by sponge swabbing carcasses before chilling were 11.6%, 0.9% and 11.0% of excised samples, respectively; the corresponding percentages recovered after chilling were 23.9%, 11.1% and 5.0%. Numbers of all bacteria present on the post-chill carcasses were substantially lower than on the pre-chill carcasses. Excision usually produced more countable plates for coliforms and injured coliforms on chilled carcasses than sponge swabbing and therefore, is more suitable in estimating low numbers of faecal bacteria on chilled carcasses. To explore the possible structural bases for these findings, skin samples were inoculated with 10(2)-10(7) cfu cm(-2) faecal bacteria and examined by scanning electron microscopy. Chilled samples showed bacteria and biofilm embedded in superficial crevices, which underlies a possible reason for the lower recovery of bacterial cells by the sponge swabbing. The study indicates that the differences between sampling techniques may be a result of the chilling process of swine carcasses.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]