These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Postsurgical sequential methotrexate/5-FU and leucovorin on outpatient basis for advanced colorectal carcinoma. Author: Tokunaga Y, Kitaoka A, Yagi T, Tokuka A, Ohsumi K. Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):128-32. PubMed ID: 11268947. Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: The present study compared the effects of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil followed by leucovorin rescue (MFL), as an adjuvant chemotherapy versus a combination of UFT and mitomycin C (MMC), on patient survival and recurrence after surgery for colorectal carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Between January 1990 and December 1997, a total of 55 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated postsurgically by adjuvant chemotherapy using MFL or UFT-MMC. Surgical treatment was performed according to standardized procedures for radical resection of colorectal cancer. The patients were divided into 2 groups after surgery. The MFL regimen consisted of MTX (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2) at hour 24, followed by leucovorin rescue. The UFT-MMC regimen consisted of MMC (12 mg/m2) intraoperatively and MMC (6 mg/m2) every other week after surgery for 2 months, and oral UFT (375 mg/m2/day), a combination of tegafur and uracil in a molar ratio of 1:4, was continued for 3 years or longer depending on the patients tolerance. RESULTS: The overall survival rates after surgery were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the MFL than the UFT-MMC group. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the MFL than the UFT-MMC group, especially for liver recurrence. Disease-free survival was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the MFL than the UFT-MMC group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated the superiority of MFL therapy for improving postsurgical survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, in particular those patients with a high risk of recurrence following potential curative resection.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]