These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Tick-Theileria interactions in response to immune activation of the vector.
    Author: Watt DM, Walker AR, Lamza KA, Ambrose NC.
    Journal: Exp Parasitol; 2001 Feb; 97(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 11281705.
    Abstract:
    Watt, D. M., Walker, A. R., Lamza, K. A., and Ambrose, N. C. 2001. Tick-Theileria interactions in response to immune activation of the vector. Experimental Parasitology 97, 89-94. Immune mechanisms towards the haemoprotozoan parasite Theileria parva were investigated in their tick vector, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. The exoskeletons of adult ticks were initially pierced with bacteria-coated, saline-coated, or sterile dry glass needles. Haemolymph was extracted from the ticks at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h postinjection and applied to bacterial plates to measure the growth inhibition effects. The inhibition zones were larger with all the injected groups compared to uninjected controls. The largest inhibition zones were seen 24 h after injection with bacteria-coated needles. An experiment was carried out to investigate whether antibacterial immune responses were relevant to the parasite/tick relationship and, if so, which parasite form was most vulnerable. R. appendiculatus nymphs were infected with T. parva by feeding on an infected calf and were then injected with needles on days 7, 13, 15, and 17 throughout their moult in an attempt to induce tick immune responses at the same time as different lifecycle forms of T. parva would be present. Salivary glands from the moulted adult ticks in the control and different treatment groups were dissected out and examined for the presence of T. parva sporoblasts. No difference in infection levels was seen in any of the treatment groups compared with the controls, suggesting that immune responses in R. appendiculatus, induced by bacterial injection, do not affect T. parva infections. The fecundity of injected ticks was compared with that of uninjected controls to ensure that the injection procedure itself was not detrimental to the ticks. Injected females had higher engorgement masses than controls but reduced levels of egg hatching.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]