These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic inadequacy of dilatation and curettage.
    Author: Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Vicino M, Marello F, Impedovo L, Selvaggi L.
    Journal: Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):803-5. PubMed ID: 11287038.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic inadequacy of dilatation and curettage (D&C) by comparing histologic findings with this technique with those obtained after hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENT(S): Three hundred ninety-seven patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who underwent D&C and, within 2 months, hysterectomy because of histologic findings or persistence of symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of histologic findings on D&C with those obtained after hysterectomy. RESULT(S): In 248 of 397 patients (62.5%), D&C failed to detect intrauterine disorders subsequently found at hysterectomy; the sensitivity was 46%, the specificity was 100.0%, the positive predictive value was 100.0%, and the negative predictive value was 7.1%. CONCLUSION(S): Dilatation and curettage is an inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic tool for all uterine disorders; this technique missed 62.5% of major intrauterine disorders, and all endometrial disorders were still present in the removed uterus.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]