These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Early endoscopic realignment of post-traumatic posterior urethral disruption.
    Author: Moudouni SM, Patard JJ, Manunta A, Guiraud P, Lobel B, Guillé F.
    Journal: Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4):628-32. PubMed ID: 11306365.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The management of complete or partial urethral disruption is controversial, and much debate continues regarding immediate versus delayed definitive therapy. We further analyze our experience and long-term results using early endoscopic realignment. METHODS: Between April 1987 and January 1999, 29 men with posterior urethral disruption (23 complete and 6 partial) underwent primary urethral realignment 0 to 8 days after injury. Pelvic fractures were present in 23 patients. In all patients, the actual operating time for realignment was 75 minutes or less. All patients were evaluated postoperatively for incontinence, impotence, and strictures. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 68 months (range 18 to 155), all patients were continent. Four patients (13.7%) required conversion to an open perineal urethroplasty. At the last follow-up visit, 25 (86%) of the 29 patients were potent and 4 achieved adequate erections for intercourse using intracorporeal injections (prostaglandin E(1)). Twelve patients (41%) developed short secondary strictures and were successfully treated with internal urethrotomy. The mean follow-up of these 12 patients was 83 months (range 34 to 120). Urinary flow rate measurement at the last follow-up visit revealed satisfactory voiding parameters in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Primary endoscopic realignment offers an effective method for treating traumatic urethral injuries. Our long-term follow-up provides additional support for the use of this technique by demonstrating that urethral continuity can be established without an increased incidence of impotence, stricture formation, or incontinence. In case of failure, endoscopic realignment does not compromise the result of secondary urethroplasty.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]