These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in conjunction with preoperative imaging and concise parathyroidectomy. Author: Johnson LR, Doherty G, Lairmore T, Moley JF, Brunt LM, Koenig J, Scott MG. Journal: Clin Chem; 2001 May; 47(5):919-25. PubMed ID: 11325897. Abstract: BACKGROUND: (99m)Tc-sestamibi scans and rapid, intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays allow preoperative identification of diseased glands and intraoperative confirmation of diseased gland removal, respectively. Use of these two new technologies may facilitate simpler, more concise surgery, shorter hospital stays, and decreased costs for frozen-section analysis. One major drawback to this new strategy has been the high cost of rapid point-of-care PTH assays. METHODS: We performed rapid PTH assays with the DPC Turbo PTH assay on the DPC IMMULITE automated analyzer. The number of intraoperative frozen sections, type of anesthesia, surgical approach, length of hospital stay, and pre- and postoperative calcium values were compared between a group of 49 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy where the intraoperative PTH assay was used in conjunction with preoperative imaging, and a historical control group of 55 patients before the use of these two technologies in our institution. RESULTS: Comparison of the Turbo PTH assay to the standard IMMULITE PTH assay gave the following: y = 1.08 x - 4.36 (r = 0.97; n = 48). For the 49 patients, the median turnaround time for each intraoperative PTH determination was 19 min (range, 14-40 min). The median decrease in PTH values from baseline was 88% (range, 33-99%). Thirty-seven patients required two PTH determinations, 7 required three, 4 had four, and 1 required five determinations. The average laboratory cost for the rapid intraoperative PTH assays was < $100 per patient (range, $55 to $113). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had significantly fewer frozen sections (1.4 vs 2.5; P < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (17 discharged on the day of surgery vs none discharged on the day of surgery; P < 0.0001), greater use of local anesthesia (33% vs 0%; P < 0.001), and more unilateral, rather than bilateral neck explorations (65% vs 0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intraoperative Turbo PTH assay and preoperative (99m)Tc-sestamibi scans can lead to significant decreases in laboratory and surgical pathology costs, hospital stays, and exposure to general anesthesia by facilitating concise parathyroidectomy surgery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]