These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Antibody responses of hens fed vitamin E and passively acquired antibodies of their chicks.
    Author: Boa-Amponsem K, Price SE, Geraert PA, Picard M, Siegel PB.
    Journal: Avian Dis; 2001; 45(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 11332472.
    Abstract:
    Antibody responses of hens and their progeny were studied in commercial broiler nuclear lines. Starting at 168 days of age, individually housed pullets from lines A and B were fed a 16% crude protein and 2752 kcal metabolizable energy/kg mash diet supplemented with either 10 or 300 IU/kg of vitamin E fed as dl-alpha-tocopherol acetate. Fifty-eight days later (226 days of age), 12 hens per line-vitamin E subclass were inoculated i.v. with 0.1 ml of a 2.5% suspension of sheep red blood cells (SRBC). Plasma antibody titers were measured 6, 20, 40, 54, 70, and 88 days after inoculation. Hens from both lines were artificially mated to males from line C, and progeny from eggs collected 9-15, 25-30, and 65-70 days after inoculation were tested for antibodies to SRBC. Hens were reinoculated i.v. with 0.1 ml of 0.25% SRBC 88 days after the first inoculation, and their antibody levels were measured 3, 6, and 20 days later. Eggs laid 10-13 days after reinoculation were incubated, and antibody titers of chicks were measured at hatch. Antibody response of hens to an initial inoculation of SRBC was line-diet-time after inoculation specific. In line A, titers were greater for hens fed the lower than the higher vitamin E diet, whereas diet had no effect on the antibody levels in line B. Line effects (A > B) were observed on days 6 and 20 after inoculation but not thereafter. After the second inoculation, dietary vitamin E level had no effect on antibody levels of hens within lines, whereas a between-line difference (A > B) was observed for the lower but not the higher level of dietary vitamin E. Although there was no difference between diets for antibody transferred to progeny by line B, there was a difference (lower > higher) for line A. After reinoculation of their dams, antibody titers of chicks from line A, but not line B, reached levels similar to those after the first inoculation. Antibody levels were higher for chicks at hatch than in 16-day embryos or 10 days posthatch. The results of this research suggest genetic variation in response to immune stimulation by dietary vitamin E.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]