These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inhalation of [123I]alpha1-protease inhibitor: toward a new therapeutic concept of alpha1-protease inhibitor deficiency?
    Author: Kropp J, Wencker M, Hotze A, Banik N, Hübner GE, Wunderlich G, Ulbrich E, Konietzko N, Biersack HJ.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 11337570.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: The alpha1-protease inhibitor (alpha1-Pi) is separated from human serum and is therefore extremely expensive. Because only 2%-3% concentrates in the lung after intravenous administration, inhalational therapy for alpha1-Pi deficiency would seem likely to be better. The aims of this study were therefore to determine the pattern of deposition of inhaled alpha1-Pi labeled with 123I and measure the amount deposited in the lungs. METHODS: Eighteen patients with congenital severe alpha1-Pi deficiency were enrolled in the study. The low-specific-activity 123I-labeled alpha1-Pi aerosol (median particle size +/- SD, 3.9 +/- 2.5 microm) was generated by an air pressure-driven nebulizer. The patients inhaled for an average of 23.6 +/- 8.9 min. Static scintigrams in two projections were acquired immediately after (T1) and 1 (T2), 4 (T3), and 24 h (T4) after inhalation. The patients were divided into the following three groups according to their forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): group I, < or =40% of predicted normal (n = 8); group II, 40% < FEV1 < or = 60% of predicted normal (n = 4); group III, >60% of predicted normal (n = 6). RESULTS: The absolute percentage uptake values of alpha1-Pi in group I were 12.4 for T1, 7.3 for T2, 4.6 for T3, and 1.2 for T4; in group II the values were 13.0, 9.6, 6.2, and 2.0, respectively; and in group III, 14.6, 11.4, 6.5, and 3.6, respectively. Differences between the groups were generally statistically significant. Between T1 and T2, the probability value was <0.05 for group I versus group II, <0.006 for group I versus group III, and <0.39 for group II versus group III. Between T1 and T3, the probability value was <0.29 for group I versus group II, <0.22 for group I versus group III, and <0.94 for group II versus group III. Retention (between T1 and T4) was also dependent on the grade of the disease: P < 0.2 for group I versus group II, P < 0.001 for group I versus group III, and P < 0.02 for group II versus group III. Grading of the uptake pattern by three independent experienced investigators (87% agreement) revealed a peripheral deposition that was group dependent. We found that greater peripheral deposition corresponded with lower lung functional impairment: P < 0.5 for group I versus group II, P < 0.01 for group I versus group III, and P < 0.08 for group II versus group III. Degradation also corresponded with functional impairment: P < 0.05 for group I versus group II, P < 0.006 for group I versus group III, and P < 0.3 for group II versus group III. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that sufficient amounts of alpha1-Pi can be deposited in the periphery of the lung by inhalation at least in patients with low-grade disease. Inhalation of alpha1-Pi may thus represent a new and more convenient route of drug administration.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]