These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Verifying and evaluating progressive addition lenses in clinical practice.
    Author: Bell GR.
    Journal: Optometry; 2001 Apr; 72(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 11338449.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that more than 50% of multifocal lenses dispensed in the United States are progressive addition lenses, adequate methods for clinical verification of these lenses have been lacking. Using automated lens meter techniques, the author describes a simplified method for verification of these complex lenses. METHODS: Thirty pairs of progressive lenses were measured in a modified method using a Humphrey 330 Lens Analyzer. Fifteen pairs were "premium-quality" progressive lenses: fifteen pairs were "non-premium-quality" progressives. Five criteria were assessed on each lens: Distance Zone Width (DZW). Intermediate Zone Width (IZW), Near Zone Width (NZW), Drop Distance (DD), and Maximum Astigmatic Distortion (MAD). RESULTS: "Premium-quality" progressive lenses failed to demonstrate clear-cut superiority over "non-premium-quality" progressive lenses in the five specified criteria. Individual measurements indicate considerable product inconsistency affected every brand tested. CONCLUSIONS: Premium- and non-premium-quality progressive lenses demonstrated similar performance characteristics in this study. Zone size variation in these lenses was found to be considerable, a characteristic that seemed to cut across brand lines. The AO Compact lens seemed to demonstrate a shorter drop distance than other lenses, which does enhance its suitability for use with small frames. A comparison of the Essilor Natural PAL to the Younger Image lens showed little difference in the categories measured, although peripheral distortions seemed closer to the reading zone in the image. A comparison of the MAD of lenses in this study to lenses tested in 1986 indicates a considerable improvement has been made in that important characteristic.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]