These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Screening for coeliac disease in families of adults with Type 1 diabetes based on serological markers.
    Author: Matteucci E, Cinapri V, Quilici S, Lucchetti A, Mugnaini P, Giampietro O.
    Journal: Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2001 Feb; 14(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11345164.
    Abstract:
    The prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in the adult population is unknown because silent and latent stages do exist. Type 1 diabetes mellitus may be associated with CD because of common genetic background and/or shared pathogenetic mechanisms. We investigated 74 adults with type 1 diabetes (32+/-11 yr, disease duration 13+/-9 yr), 69 parents of diabetic probands (56+/-10 yr), 59 siblings (30+/-11 yr) and 50 healthy controls (35+/-10 yr) for the presence of circulating islet cell antibodies (ICA), anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA65), anti-gliadin immunoglobulins A and G (IgA- and IgG-AGA). All patients with raised AGA, performed also IgA anti-endomysium antibody (EmA) indirect immunofluorescence assay. Samples were positive for ICA in 19 diabetics (26%), 4 parents (6%), 4 siblings (7%), 0 controls (p<0.001); for GADA in 34 diabetics (46%), 4 parents (6%), 1 sibling (2%), 0 controls (p<0.001). Twenty-five diabetic patients (34%), 10 parents (14%), 5 siblings (8%), 3 controls (6%) (p<0.001) had raised IgA-AGA (>4.4 mg/l). Four diabetic patients (5%), 5 parents (7%), 0 siblings (0%), 4 controls (8%) had raised IgG-AGA (>18 mg/l). Both IgA- and IgG-AGA were detected in 1 diabetic and 2 parents. The prevalence of ICA, GADA, and IgA-AGA positivity in Type 1 diabetes patients was significantly higher than in controls (p<0.001). Finally, 50 AGA-positive subjects performed EmA test: only 2 of them resulted EmA-positive, a diabetic patient and a sibling. The patient with Type 1 diabetes had a small-bowel biopsy specimen consistent with CD and, as sole evidence of malabsorption, sideropenic anaemia. EmA-positive sibling also showed severe iron deficiency, yet refused endoscopy. We conclude that: 1) CD cannot be diagnosed on the basis of associated IgA- and IgG-AGA alone. Nevertheless, detection of such antibodies is useful, in combination with EmA, in screening for endoscopic biopsy; 2) too high rate of detection of IgA-AGA in Type 1 diabetic patients in comparison with other groups excludes a false positivity of the test itself, while suggests a pathogenetic association of both immunological disorders, perhaps related to abnormal gammadelta TCR-bearing intraepithelial lymphocytes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]