These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multiple inert gas elimination technique for determining ventilation/perfusion distributions in rat during normoxia, hypoxia and hyperoxia.
    Author: Alfaro V, Roca-Acín J, Palacios L, Guitart R.
    Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2001; 28(5-6):419-24. PubMed ID: 11380516.
    Abstract:
    1. The use of the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) in quantifying ventilation/perfusion distributions (V*A/Q*) in small animals, such as the rat, may cause results to be biased due to haemodilution produced by the large volume of liquid infused intravenously. 2. We tested two methods of administering inert gases in rats using the MIGET: (i) standard continuous intravenous administration of inert gases (method A); and (ii) a new method based on the physicochemical properties of each inert gas (method B). This method included acute simultaneous inert gas administration using three pathways: inhalation, intravenous infusion and rectal infusion. Both MIGET methods were applied to obtain data while breathing three different inspiratory fractions of oxygen (FIO2): normoxia, hypoxia and hyperoxia. 3. Inert gas levels obtained from blood or expired air samples were sufficient for chromatographic measurement, at least during a 2 h period. The V*A/Q* distributions reported using both methods were acceptable for all the physiological conditions studied; therefore, the alternative method used here may be useful in further MIGET studies in rats because haemodilution resulting from continuous intravenous infusion of less-soluble gases can be avoided. 4. Normoxic rats showed lower mean values of the V*A/Q* ratio of ventilation distribution and higher mean values of the V*A/Q* ratio of perfusion distribution with the usual method of inert gas administration (method A). These non-significant differences were observed under almost all physiological conditions studied and they could be caused by haemodilution. Nevertheless, the effect of interindividual differences cannot be discarded. An additional effect of the low haematocrit on cardiovascular changes due to low FIO2, such as pulmonary vasoconstriction or increased cardiac output, may explain the lower dispersion of perfusion distributions found in group A during hypoxia.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]