These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.
    Author: Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2112-22. PubMed ID: 11386563.
    Abstract:
    Three experiments were conducted to determine the extent to which perceived separation of speech and interference improves speech recognition in the free field. Target speech stimuli were 320 grammatically correct but nonmeaningful sentences spoken by a female talker. In the first experiment the interference was a recording of either one or two female talkers reciting a continuous stream of similar nonmeaningful sentences. The target talker was always presented from a loudspeaker directly in front (0 degrees). The interference was either presented from the front loudspeaker (the F-F condition) or from both a right loudspeaker (60 degrees) and the front loudspeaker, with the right leading the front by 4 ms (the F-RF condition). Due to the precedence effect, the interference in the F-RF condition was perceived to be well to the right, while the target talker was heard from the front. For both the single-talker and two-talker interference, there was a sizable improvement in speech recognition in the F-RF condition compared with the F-F condition. However, a second experiment showed that there was no F-RF advantage when the interference was noise modulated by the single- or multi-channel envelope of the two-talker masker. Results of the third experiment indicated that the advantage of perceived separation is not limited to conditions where the interfering speech is understandable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]