These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Retrospective assessment of 546 all-ceramic anterior and posterior crowns in a general practice. Author: Segal BS. Journal: J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):544-50. PubMed ID: 11404754. Abstract: STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is need to determine whether following a consistent procedural protocol in a private dental practice will result in high success rates for all-ceramic anterior and posterior crowns fabricated from aluminous porcelain veneered to high-alumina content-supporting cores. Aluminous porcelain is known to have poor tensile strength and fracture resistance when subjected to shear forces. PURPOSE: This study examined the long-term survivability of alumina core, all-ceramic crowns in both anterior and posterior locations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following a consistent protocol over 6 years, 546 all-ceramic, In-Ceram crowns (32.4% anterior [n = 177] and 67.6% posterior [n = 369]) were consecutively luted with glass ionomer resin hybrid cement and periodically observed by the same dentist who prepared and cemented them. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 99.1% (n = 541) with a 0.9% (n = 5) failure rate. The success-to-failure ratio for anterior all-ceramic crowns was 98.9% to 1.1% (n = 175:2); the posterior crown ratio was 99.2% to 0.8% (n = 366:3). CONCLUSION: Following a consistent protocol of careful tooth preparation and crown cementation resulted in high success rates for anterior and posterior all-ceramic crowns. Glass ionomer resin hybrid cement appeared to be a reliable luting agent. All-ceramic alumina core crowns are durable and provide optimum esthetic choices for anterior and posterior locations.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]