These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Lactational amenorrhea/anovulation and some of their determinants: a comparison of well-nourished and undernourished women. Author: Wasalathanthri S, Tennekoon KH. Journal: Fertil Steril; 2001 Aug; 76(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 11476779. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of maternal nutritional status and some other possible determinants on lactational amenorrhea/anovulation. DESIGN: Prospective matched-pairs study. SETTING: Postpartum wards and community and academic settings. PATIENT(S): Thirty matched pairs of otherwise healthy, well-nourished (body mass index > or = 26.00 kg/m2) and undernourished (body mass index < or = 19.00 kg/m2) postpartum women were selected. INTERVENTION(S): Infant feeding pattern was recorded weekly, and infant weights, maternal body mass index, and maternal PRL levels were estimated every 4 weeks until resumption of menstruation. Ovulatory activity was determined using urinary estrone and pregnanediol glucuronide concentrations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Time of resumption of menstruation, regular and ovulatory. RESULT(S): Well-nourished women resumed regular menstruation significantly earlier than undernourished women but resumed ovulatory menstruation at almost the same time. Undernourished women had fewer anovulatory cycles preceding first postpartum ovulation and a higher prevalence of formula feeding. Effect of body mass index on lactational amenorrhea became nonsignificant when nonintroduction of formula feeds, maternal age, and socioeconomic status were controlled for. CONCLUSION(S): Improved maternal nutritional status has no significant effect on fertility: ovulation is not advanced despite early resumption of regular menstruation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]