These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Body water compartment measurements: a comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis with tritium and sodium bromide dilution techniques.
    Author: Simpson JA, Lobo DN, Anderson JA, Macdonald IA, Perkins AC, Neal KR, Allison SP, Rowlands BJ.
    Journal: Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 20(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 11478832.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was undertaken to assess the comparability of body water compartment estimates in healthy volunteers using single and dual frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with established reference methods of tritium and NaBr dilution. METHODS: Total body water (TBW) was estimated in 10 healthy volunteers using single frequency (50 kHz) BIA (Bodystat 1500), dual frequency (5 and 200 kHz) BIA (Bodystat Dualscan 2005) and tritium dilution. Extracellular water (ECW) was measured with dual frequency BIA and NaBr dilution. BIA was performed using distal tetrapolar electrodes in the supine position. Venous blood was sampled for measurement of background concentrations of tritium and NaBr using a beta counter and high performance liquid chromatography respectively. 10 ml tritiated water (3.7 MBq) and 50 ml 5% NaBr solution were then injected intravenously and blood samples taken from the opposite arm every 45 min for 4.5 h for estimation of concentrations of tritium and NaBr. RESULTS: There was good correlation (r(2)=0.76) between estimates of ECW using dual frequency BIA and NaBr dilution, with the former overestimating ECW by approximately 1 L. However, this difference varied systematically with body weight. Although TBW measurements obtained by single and dual frequency BIA correlated well with estimates using tritium dilution (r(2)=0.96 and 0.95 respectively), single frequency BIA underestimated TBW by approximately 1 L and dual frequency BIA by approximately 5 L compared to tritium dilution. CONCLUSION: TBW measurements obtained using the single frequency BIA device were more accurate than those obtained using the dual frequency BIA device. Dual frequency BIA provided a reasonably accurate estimate of ECW.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]