These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test.
    Author: Harris SR, Daniels LE.
    Journal: J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 11487752.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT), a screening tool that can be administered and scored in <30 minutes, with the goal of identifying neuromotor differences in infants aged 3 to 12 months. STUDY DESIGN: Infants, aged 3 to 12 months (n = 54), were assessed in 2 high-risk infant follow-up programs in Vancouver, British Columbia. Inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater reliability were examined. Concurrent and predictive validity of the HINT with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) were evaluated by using the Pearson product-moment correlation. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability for the Total HINT Score ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Concurrent validity of the HINT with the BSID-II Mental Scale during the first year was r = -0.73 (P <.01), and with the BSID-II Motor Scale, r = -0.89 (P <.01). The predictive relationships between the HINT and the BSID-II at 17 to 22 months were r = -0.11 for the BSID-II Mental Scale and r = -0.49 (P <.01) for the BSID-II Motor Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The HINT is reliable for screening infant neuromotor performance and has strong concurrent validity with the Bayley-II Mental and Motor Scales. HINT scores during the first year accounted for 24% of the variance of Bayley-II Motor scores at 17 to 22 months.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]