These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon.
    Author: Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H, Mukai H, Yokota T, Kozu T, Saito D.
    Journal: Endoscopy; 2001 Aug; 33(8):682-6. PubMed ID: 11490384.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Laterally spreading tumors (LST) of the colon are best removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as they extend laterally rather than vertically. Since they sometimes invade deeply into the submucosal layer, it is important to assess the depth of invasion endoscopically before treatment. In the present study, we examined the endoscopic features of a large number of LSTs in order to assess which features correlated with depth of invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 257 LSTs removed at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, between January 1988 and September 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: With univariate analysis, unevenness of nodules, presence of large nodules, size, histological type, and presence of depression in the tumor were significantly associated with depth of invasion. Multivariate analysis revealed that histological type and depression in the tumor were independent factors predicting massive submucosal invasion. When an LST showed: 1) even nodules without depression, or 2) uneven nodules without depression and less than 3 mm in diameter, the risk of massive submucosal invasion was 0 % (0/121) and 3.7 % (3/82), respectively. CONCLUSION: When LSTs meet the above endoscopic criteria, EMR should be the first-line treatment because of the low risk of massive submucosal invasion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]