These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Video vs. CD-ROM for teaching pelvic anatomy to third-year medical students. A comparison.
    Author: Sultana CJ, Levy J, Rogers R.
    Journal: J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):675-7. PubMed ID: 11499188.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and student acceptance of video and CD-ROM review of pelvic anatomy in third-year obstetrics and gynecology students. STUDY DESIGN: A 34-item pretest was administered on the first day of the clerkship. Students were then randomized to watch a 45-minute video or use an interactive CD-ROM at home. All students took a posttest identical to the pretest. Examination scores were compared by paired and unpaired t test. Students completed a questionnaire on each method's ease, appropriateness, organization, appeal and time spent and whether they would recommend the method to others. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six students were randomized, 88 to CD and 88 to video. There was 100% compliance, although not all questionnaire items were completed. The mean pretest score for both groups was 50%. The posttest CD mean score was significantly different from the posttest video mean (64% vs. 70%). Both groups significantly improved after the intervention. The video group noted ease of use, but only 49% recommended it for the future. The CD-ROM was recommended by 80%. Student comments favored the CD-ROM. CONCLUSION: Use of video review resulted in short-term significantly higher test scores, but students preferred an interactive CD-ROM. This method should be made available to all students during the rotation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]