These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Redilation of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease: factors implicated in the development of restenosis and neointimal proliferation.
    Author: McMahon CJ, El-Said HG, Grifka RG, Fraley JK, Nihill MR, Mullins CE.
    Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Aug; 38(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 11499747.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the incidence of and risk factors for the development of restenosis and neointimal proliferation after endovascular stent implantation for congenital heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: Risk factors for the development of restenosis and neointimal proliferation are poorly understood. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular stent redilation between September 1989 and February 2000. RESULTS: Of 368 patients who had 752 stents implanted, 220 were recatheterized. Of those 220 patients, 103 underwent stent redilation. Patients were classified into three groups: 1) those with pulmonary artery stenosis (n = 94), tetralogy of Fallot/pulmonary atresia (n = 72), congenital branch pulmonary stenosis (n = 9), status post-Fontan operation (n = 6), status post-arterial switch operation (n = 7); 2) those with iliofemoral venous obstruction (n = 6); and 3) those with miscellaneous disorders (n = 3). The patients' median age was 9.9 years (range 0.5 to 39.8); their mean follow-up duration was 3.8 years (range 0.1 to 10). Indications for stent redilation included somatic growth (n = 67), serial dilation (n = 27) and development of neointimal proliferation or restenosis, or both (n = 9). There was a low incidence of neointimal proliferation (1.8%) and restenosis (2%). There were no deaths. Complications included pulmonary edema (n = 1), hemoptysis (n = 1) and contralateral stent compression (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Redilation or further dilation of endovascular stents for CHD is effective as late as 10 years. The risk of neointimal proliferation (1.8%) and restenosis (2%) is low and possibly avoidable. Awareness of specific risk factors and modification of the stent implantation technique, including avoidance of minimal stent overlap and sharp angulation of the stent to the vessel wall and avoidance of overdilation, have helped to reduce the incidence of restenosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]