These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients on peritoneal dialysis.
    Author: Fein PA, Madane SJ, Jorden A, Babu K, Mushnick R, Avram MM, Grosman I.
    Journal: Adv Perit Dial; 2001; 17():148-52. PubMed ID: 11510264.
    Abstract:
    Protein malnutrition is now well established as an important contributory factor to the high mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Low dietary protein calorie intake is one of the factors leading to protein malnutrition. If PD patients develop difficulty eating, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding may prove beneficial in providing adequate nutrition. Studies on the effectiveness of PEG feeding in PD patients are limited to pediatric patients. The objective of the present study was to assess the outcome of PEG feeding in adult patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on PD. We retrospectively reviewed charts from May 1992 to February 2000 of 10 consecutive patients in our center who had had feeding tubes inserted. The patients' ages ranged from 37 to 81 years, with mean age of 65. Of the 10 patients, 7 were male, 5 were diabetic, and 1 was infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Two patients had cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with dysphagia, 3 had multi-infarct dementia, 2 had anoxic encephalopathy, 2 had dementia, and 1 had calciphylaxis with anorexia. Of the 10 patients, 9 failed to eat because of neurologic disorders. Two patients who had functioning PEG feedings before starting PD had no complications. Only 2 of 8 patients already on PD continued with long-term PD after a PEG was inserted. Both patients whose PD was not interrupted at the time of PEG placement immediately developed peritonitis. Of the 6 patients who were maintained on hemodialysis (HD), 2 developed peritonitis within one week of starting PEG feedings. The other 4 had no complications from PEG feedings while being maintained on HD, but 1 developed peritonitis when PD was resumed. Of the 5 patients who developed peritonitis, 3 experienced fungal peritonitis. In PD patients, PEG feeding is associated with frequent complications. However, PEG placement prior to PD initiation appears to be safe. Maintaining patients on HD for at least 6 weeks appears to decrease the incidence of peritonitis, but does not eliminate it. Use of anti-fungal prophylaxis and maintenance of the patient on HD for longer than 6 weeks may produce better results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]