These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Airway challenge testing - accuracy of the interrupter technique].
    Author: Schildge J, Klar B, Gaiser R.
    Journal: Pneumologie; 2001 Sep; 55(9):425-30. PubMed ID: 11536066.
    Abstract:
    According to national and international recommendations the bronchial sensitivity should be determined based on the decrease of the FEV1 by 20 % (FEV1 - 20) or the increase of the airway resistance by means of body plethysmography by 100 % (Raw + 100). Measurement of airway resistance by interrupter technique (Rint) is a simple method and needs no active cooperation of the patient, but is not recommended in airway challenge testing. We investigated the role of the increase of Rint by 100 % (Rint + 100) compared to Raw + 100 and FEV1 - 20 during carbachol airway challenge testing by means of dosimetry. We examined 123 patients with following symptoms: 85 x coughing, 31 x coughing and dyspnea, 7 x medical opinion. Significant correlations between Rint and Raw were found before and after the challenge tests (Rint before/after 0,3 +/- 0,13/0,36 +/- 0,25 kPa*s/l; Raw before/after 0,24 +/- 0,09/0,50 +/- 0,41 kPa*s/l; r = 0,504/0,672; p < 0,001 [Pearson]). The median values of Rint and Raw were significantly different (p < 0,001 [Wilcoxon]). Moreover Rint systematically overestimated airway resistance in the normal range and underestimated the increase of airway resistance during challenge testing (r = 0,783; p < 0,001 [Pearson]). In 58 patients an increased airway responsiveness was found. In 21 oft these patients there was no increase of Rint above the initial value. Sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value in % to the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness were in Rint + 100 9/95/63/54, in FEV1 - 20 61/100/100/66 and in Raw + 100 98/100/100/98. In conclusion we found significant correlations between Rint and Raw, but the median values were systematically and significantly different. Rint + 100 had a low sensitivity to detect airway hyperresponsiveness and is not comparable with FEV1 - 20 or Raw + 100.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]