These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Determinants of peritubular capillary fluid uptake in hydropenia and saline and plasma expansion.
    Author: Blantz RC, Tucker BJ.
    Journal: Am J Physiol; 1975 Jun; 228(6):1927-35. PubMed ID: 1155624.
    Abstract:
    Hydrostatic (HPc) and oncotic (phic) pressures within the peritubular capillary, tubular pressure (Pt), nephron filtration rate, and plasma flow, and proximal fractional and absolute reabsorption (APR) were measured in anesthetized rats during hydropenia and plasma and saline expansion. Net interstitial pressure (phii-HPi) was estimated from subcapsular hydrostatic and oncotic pressures during saline expansion and these data were applied to a mathematical model of peritubular capillary fluid uptake to determine the profile of effective reabsorption pressure (ERP) with distance (x*) alongthe capillary and calculate the peritubular capillary permeability coefficient (LpAr). ERPX* = (PHIC MINUS HPC)X* MINUS (PHII MINUS HPi) and APR = ERPX*LpAr. During saline expansion phii minus HPi was -12.1 plus or minus 0.8 mmHg and ERP,3.8 mm. The LpAr was 0.07 nl/s per g KW per mmHg, and this value was applied to hypropenia and plasma expansion to determine ERP and phii minus HPi. The phiiminus HPi was +6.0 and +5.0 mmHg, respectively, and ERP was 4.1 and 3.5 mmHg. Efective reabsorptive pressure remained positive along x* in all states, and phii minus HPi correlated best changes in phic and poorly with changes in efferent plasma flow. The APR did not correlate with either calculated phii minus HPi or the transepithelial driving pressure, Pt + phii minus HPi.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]