These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The test-retest reliability of gas exchange kinetics in humans using a pseudo random binary sequence exercise test.
    Author: Edwards AM, Challis NV, Chapman JH, Claxton DB, Fysh ML.
    Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Aug; 85(3-4):333-8. PubMed ID: 11560088.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to compare the test-retest reliability of oxygen uptake (VO2) kinetics with carbon dioxide output (VCO2) kinetics using a pseudo random binary sequence (PRBS) exercise test. A reliable test of gas exchange kinetics would have the potential of being applied as a sports fitness test. Ten healthy male subjects agreed to participate in the study and all subjects completed two identical PRBS exercise tests (test 1 and test 2), separated by a 30 min period of inactivity. Three consecutive 300 s PRBS cycles were completed in each test with 20 s exercise intensity changes between 25 and 85 W using an electrically braked cycle ergometer. Fourier analysis was computed for frequencies 3.3, 6.7 and 10 mHz. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures did not reveal significant differences between test 1 and test 2 for either VO2 kinetics or VCO2 kinetics. Static gain of VO2 for test 1 [9.11 (SD 0.59) ml.min-1.W-1] and test 2 [9.23 (SD 0.64) ml.min-1.W-1] did not differ significantly between tests. The 95% limits of agreement for VCO2 kinetics displayed increased variability in comparison to VO2 kinetics at each frequency of amplitude ratio and phase shift. Systematic bias ranged between 0% and 4%, except at frequency 10 mHz of VCO2 kinetics phase shift which showed a 10% bias for slower VO2 kinetics in test 2. It is possible that the increased variability of VCO2 kinetics compared to VO2 kinetics might be attributable to a lower signal to noise ratio in VCO2 kinetics, variations in ventilation or the storage mechanisms of CO2. The lower variability of VO2 kinetics compared with VCO2 kinetics suggests that the PRBS test of VO2 kinetics has the greater potential for further development as an indicator of aerobic fitness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]