These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative study of fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia: histopathological, immunohistochemical, argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region and DNA ploidy analysis.
    Author: Maki M, Saitoh K, Horiuchi H, Morohoshi T, Fukayama M, Machinami R.
    Journal: Pathol Int; 2001 Aug; 51(8):603-11. PubMed ID: 11564214.
    Abstract:
    Fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia are both benign fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. We retrospectively studied the clinicopathological findings in 90 cases of fibrous dysplasia and 17 cases of osteofibrous dysplasia. In these cases, the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the presence of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR), as well as DNA ploidy, were examined. The bones affected by fibrous dysplasia were the maxilla, femur and frontal bone. Osteofibrous dysplasia occurred exclusively in the tibia or fibula. The average age of patients with fibrous dysplasia (24.0 years) was higher than that of patients with osteofibrous dysplasia (12.9 years). Fibrous dysplasias were divided into four major histological subtypes: Pagetoid, Chinese alphabet, small bone and parallel bone. Bone lining cells, which are known as resting osteoblasts, were seen in some cases of fibrous dysplasia. Cartilage differentiation was not seen in osteofibrous dysplasia. PCNA expression was strongly positive in the nuclei of osteoblasts around the bone trabeculae in osteofibrous dysplasia, but negative in the nuclei of bone lining cells around the bone trabeculae in fibrous dysplasia. The number of AgNOR in osteofibrous dysplasia was slightly higher than that in fibrous dysplasia. Both fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia were diploid. These features suggest that fibrous dysplasia can be differentiated from osteofibrous dysplasia by anatomical site, patient age, histological appearance, cartilage differentiation and PCNA positivity. DNA content by image cytometry is not a useful tool for differentiating these two diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]